Re: [PATCH v2] RDMA/umem: minor bug fix and cleanup in error handling paths

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 05:37:18PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 3/5/19 5:34 PM, John Hubbard wrote:
> [snip]
> >>> So release_pages(&local_page_list[j+1], npages - j-1) would be correct.
> >>
> >> Someone send a fixup patch please...
> >>
> >> Jason
> > 
> > Yeah, I'm on it. Just need to double-check that this is the case. But Jason,
> > you're confirming it already, so that helps too.

I didn't look, just assuming Artemy is right since he knows this
code..

> > Patch coming shortly.
> > 
> 
> Jason, btw, do you prefer a patch that fixes the previous one, or a new 
> patch that stands alone? (I'm not sure how this tree is maintained, exactly.)

It has past the point when I should apply a fixup, rdma is general has
about an approximately 1 day period after the 'thanks applied' message
where rebase is possible

Otherwise the tree is strictly no rebase

Jason




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux