Re: [patch v2] oom: replace PF_OOM_ORIGIN with toggling oom_score_adj

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Minchan Kim wrote:

> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
> 

Thanks!

> Seem to be reasonable and code don't have a problem.
> But couldn't we make the function in general(ex, passed task_struct)
> and use it when we change oom_score_adj(ex, oom_score_adj_write)?
> 

I thought about doing that, but oom_score_adj_write doesn't operate on 
current, so it needs to lock p->sighand differently and also does a test 
to ensure that the new value is only less than the current value for 
CAP_SYS_RESOURCE.  That test is required to take place under the lock as 
well.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]