On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 6:59 PM Keith Busch <keith.busch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> System memory may have side caches to help improve access speed to
> frequently requested address ranges. While the system provided cache is
> transparent to the software accessing these memory ranges, applications
> can optimize their own access based on cache attributes.
>
> Provide a new API for the kernel to register these memory side caches
> under the memory node that provides it.
>
> The new sysfs representation is modeled from the existing cpu cacheinfo
> attributes, as seen from /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/side_cache/.
> Unlike CPU cacheinfo, though, the node cache level is reported from
> the view of the memory. A higher number is nearer to the CPU, while
> lower levels are closer to the backing memory. Also unlike CPU cache,
> it is assumed the system will handle flushing any dirty cached memory
> to the last level on a power failure if the range is persistent memory.
>
> The attributes we export are the cache size, the line size, associativity,
> and write back policy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/base/node.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/node.h | 39 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 181 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
> index 1e909f61e8b1..7ff3ed566d7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/node.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/node.c
> @@ -191,6 +191,146 @@ void node_set_perf_attrs(unsigned int nid, struct node_hmem_attrs *hmem_attrs,
> pr_info("failed to add performance attribute group to node %d\n",
> nid);
> }
> +
> +struct node_cache_info {
> + struct device dev;
> + struct list_head node;
> + struct node_cache_attrs cache_attrs;
> +};
> +#define to_cache_info(device) container_of(device, struct node_cache_info, dev)
> +
> +#define CACHE_ATTR(name, fmt) \
> +static ssize_t name##_show(struct device *dev, \
> + struct device_attribute *attr, \
> + char *buf) \
> +{ \
> + return sprintf(buf, fmt "\n", to_cache_info(dev)->cache_attrs.name);\
> +} \
> +DEVICE_ATTR_RO(name);
> +
> +CACHE_ATTR(size, "%llu")
> +CACHE_ATTR(level, "%u")
> +CACHE_ATTR(line_size, "%u")
> +CACHE_ATTR(associativity, "%u")
> +CACHE_ATTR(write_policy, "%u")
> +
> +static struct attribute *cache_attrs[] = {
> + &dev_attr_level.attr,
> + &dev_attr_associativity.attr,
> + &dev_attr_size.attr,
> + &dev_attr_line_size.attr,
> + &dev_attr_write_policy.attr,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(cache);
> +
> +static void node_cache_release(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + kfree(dev);
> +}
> +
> +static void node_cacheinfo_release(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct node_cache_info *info = to_cache_info(dev);
> + kfree(info);
> +}
> +
> +static void node_init_cache_dev(struct node *node)
> +{
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dev)
> + return;
> +
> + dev->parent = &node->dev;
> + dev->release = node_cache_release;
> + if (dev_set_name(dev, "side_cache"))
> + goto free_dev;
> +
> + if (device_register(dev))
> + goto free_name;
> +
> + pm_runtime_no_callbacks(dev);
> + node->cache_dev = dev;
> + return;
I would add an empty line here.
> +free_name:
> + kfree_const(dev->kobj.name);
> +free_dev:
> + kfree(dev);
> +}
> +
> +void node_add_cache(unsigned int nid, struct node_cache_attrs *cache_attrs)
> +{
> + struct node_cache_info *info;
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct node *node;
> +
> + if (!node_online(nid) || !node_devices[nid])
> + return;
> +
> + node = node_devices[nid];
> + list_for_each_entry(info, &node->cache_attrs, node) {
> + if (info->cache_attrs.level == cache_attrs->level) {
> + dev_warn(&node->dev,
> + "attempt to add duplicate cache level:%d\n",
> + cache_attrs->level);
I'd suggest using dev_dbg() for this and I'm not even sure if printing
the message is worth the effort.
Firmware will probably give you duplicates and users cannot do much
about fixing that anyway.
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!node->cache_dev)
> + node_init_cache_dev(node);
> + if (!node->cache_dev)
> + return;
> +
> + info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!info)
> + return;
> +
> + dev = &info->dev;
> + dev->parent = node->cache_dev;
> + dev->release = node_cacheinfo_release;
> + dev->groups = cache_groups;
> + if (dev_set_name(dev, "index%d", cache_attrs->level))
> + goto free_cache;
> +
> + info->cache_attrs = *cache_attrs;
> + if (device_register(dev)) {
> + dev_warn(&node->dev, "failed to add cache level:%d\n",
> + cache_attrs->level);
> + goto free_name;
> + }
> + pm_runtime_no_callbacks(dev);
> + list_add_tail(&info->node, &node->cache_attrs);
> + return;
Again, I'd add an empty line here.
> +free_name:
> + kfree_const(dev->kobj.name);
> +free_cache:
> + kfree(info);
> +}
> +
> +static void node_remove_caches(struct node *node)
> +{
> + struct node_cache_info *info, *next;
> +
> + if (!node->cache_dev)
> + return;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(info, next, &node->cache_attrs, node) {
> + list_del(&info->node);
> + device_unregister(&info->dev);
> + }
> + device_unregister(node->cache_dev);
> +}
> +
> +static void node_init_caches(unsigned int nid)
> +{
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&node_devices[nid]->cache_attrs);
> +}
> +#else
> +static void node_init_caches(unsigned int nid) { }
> +static void node_remove_caches(struct node *node) { }
> #endif
>
> #define K(x) ((x) << (PAGE_SHIFT - 10))
> @@ -475,6 +615,7 @@ void unregister_node(struct node *node)
> {
> hugetlb_unregister_node(node); /* no-op, if memoryless node */
> node_remove_classes(node);
> + node_remove_caches(node);
> device_unregister(&node->dev);
> }
>
> @@ -755,6 +896,7 @@ int __register_one_node(int nid)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&node_devices[nid]->class_list);
> /* initialize work queue for memory hot plug */
> init_node_hugetlb_work(nid);
> + node_init_caches(nid);
>
> return error;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/node.h b/include/linux/node.h
> index e22940a593c2..8cdf2b2808e4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/node.h
> +++ b/include/linux/node.h
> @@ -37,12 +37,47 @@ struct node_hmem_attrs {
> };
> void node_set_perf_attrs(unsigned int nid, struct node_hmem_attrs *hmem_attrs,
> unsigned class);
> +
> +enum cache_associativity {
> + NODE_CACHE_DIRECT_MAP,
> + NODE_CACHE_INDEXED,
> + NODE_CACHE_OTHER,
> +};
> +
> +enum cache_write_policy {
> + NODE_CACHE_WRITE_BACK,
> + NODE_CACHE_WRITE_THROUGH,
> + NODE_CACHE_WRITE_OTHER,
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct node_cache_attrs - system memory caching attributes
> + *
> + * @associativity: The ways memory blocks may be placed in cache
> + * @write_policy: Write back or write through policy
> + * @size: Total size of cache in bytes
> + * @line_size: Number of bytes fetched on a cache miss
> + * @level: Represents the cache hierarchy level
> + */
> +struct node_cache_attrs {
> + enum cache_associativity associativity;
> + enum cache_write_policy write_policy;
> + u64 size;
> + u16 line_size;
> + u8 level;
> +};
> +void node_add_cache(unsigned int nid, struct node_cache_attrs *cache_attrs);
> #else
> static inline void node_set_perf_attrs(unsigned int nid,
> struct node_hmem_attrs *hmem_attrs,
> unsigned class)
> {
> }
> +
> +static inline void node_add_cache(unsigned int nid,
> + struct node_cache_attrs *cache_attrs)
> +{
> +}
And does this really build with CONFIG_HMEM_REPORTING unset?
> #endif
>
> struct node {
> @@ -51,6 +86,10 @@ struct node {
> #if defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE) && defined(CONFIG_HUGETLBFS)
> struct work_struct node_work;
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HMEM_REPORTING
> + struct list_head cache_attrs;
> + struct device *cache_dev;
> +#endif
> };
>
> struct memory_block;
> --
