Re: [PATCH] Export mm_update_next_owner function for unuse_mm.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes, I don't need to EXPORT this symbol again. 
i have modified this patch and re-committed it.  The email link is :https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/18/8
this patch you see is old. 

thanks and regards

Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 于2018年12月18日周二 下午8:47写道:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 11:42:11AM +0800, gchen.guomin@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mm_update_next_owner);

Unless you've figured out how to build mmu_context.c as a module, you
don't need to EXPORT the symbol.  Just the below hunk is enough.

> diff --git a/mm/mmu_context.c b/mm/mmu_context.c
> index 3e612ae..9eb81aa 100644
> --- a/mm/mmu_context.c
> +++ b/mm/mmu_context.c
> @@ -60,5 +60,6 @@ void unuse_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
>       /* active_mm is still 'mm' */
>       enter_lazy_tlb(mm, tsk);
>       task_unlock(tsk);
> +     mm_update_next_owner(mm);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unuse_mm);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux