On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 12:24 +0100, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> We have:
>
> > UDP hash table entries: 128 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
> > CONFIG_BASE_SMALL=0
>
> udp_table_init looks like:
>
> if (!CONFIG_BASE_SMALL)
> table->hash = alloc_large_system_hash(name, .. &table->mask);
> /*
> * Make sure hash table has the minimum size
> */
>
> Since CONFIG_BASE_SMALL is 0, we are allocating the hash using
> alloc_large_system
> Then:
> if (CONFIG_BASE_SMALL || table->mask < UDP_HTABLE_SIZE_MIN - 1) {
> table->hash = kmalloc();
>
> table->mask is 127, and UDP_HTABLE_SIZE_MIN is 256, so we are allocating again
> table->hash without freeing already allocated memory.
Indeed (on my ARM system the reported UDP hash table entries is 512, so
I don't get the memory leak).
> We could free table->hash, before allocating the memory with kmalloc.
> I don't fully understand the condition table->mask < UDP_HTABLE_SIZE_MIN - 1.
We don't have the equivalent of free_large_system_hash(). Reordering the
'if' blocks may be better.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href