Re: pkeys: Reserve PKEY_DISABLE_READ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Ram Pai:

> So the problem is as follows:
>
> Currently the kernel supports  'disable-write'  and 'disable-access'.
>
> On x86, cpu supports 'disable-write' and 'disable-access'. This
> matches with what the kernel supports. All good.
>
> However on power, cpu supports 'disable-read' too. Since userspace can
> program the cpu directly, userspace has the ability to set
> 'disable-read' too.  This can lead to inconsistency between the kernel
> and the userspace.
>
> We want the kernel to match userspace on all architectures.

Correct.

> Proposed Solution:
>
> Enhance the kernel to understand 'disable-read', and facilitate architectures
> that understand 'disable-read' to allow it.
>
> Also explicitly define the semantics of disable-access  as 
> 'disable-read and disable-write'
>
> Did I get this right?  Assuming I did, the implementation has to do
> the following --
>   
> 	On power, sys_pkey_alloc() should succeed if the init_val
> 	is PKEY_DISABLE_READ, PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE, PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS
> 	or any combination of the three.

Agreed.

> 	On x86, sys_pkey_alloc() should succeed if the init_val is
> 	PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE or PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS or PKEY_DISABLE_READ
> 	or any combination of the three, except  PKEY_DISABLE_READ
>       	specified all by itself.

Again agreed.  That's a clever way of phrasing it actually.

> 	On all other arches, none of the flags are supported.
>
>
> Are we on the same plate?

I think so, thanks.

Florian




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux