Re: [RFC PATCH v6 01/26] Documentation/x86: Add CET description

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 10:52 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > +X86 Documentation
> > > [...]
> > > +
> > > +At run time, /proc/cpuinfo shows the availability of SHSTK and IBT.
> > 
> > What is the rough expected performance impact of CET on average function 
> > call frequency user applications and the kernel itself?
> 
> I don't have any conclusive numbers yet; but since currently only user-mode
> protection is implemented, I suspect any impact would be most likely to the
> application.  The kernel would spend some small amount of time on the setup of
> CET.

This is horribly vague.

Thanks,

	Ingo




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux