Re: [RFC PATCH v6 01/26] Documentation/x86: Add CET description

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 10:52 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > +X86 Documentation
> > [...]
> > +
> > +At run time, /proc/cpuinfo shows the availability of SHSTK and IBT.
> 
> What is the rough expected performance impact of CET on average function 
> call frequency user applications and the kernel itself?

I don't have any conclusive numbers yet; but since currently only user-mode
protection is implemented, I suspect any impact would be most likely to the
application.  The kernel would spend some small amount of time on the setup of
CET.

Yu-cheng




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux