On 10/23/2018 11:05 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 23-10-18 08:26:40, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 09:02:56AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > [...] >>> The way it can be handled is by adding a test module under lib. test_kmod, >>> test_sysctl, test_user_copy etc. >> >> The problem is that said module can only invoke functions which are >> exported using EXPORT_SYMBOL. And there's a cost to exporting them, >> which I don't think we're willing to pay, purely to get test coverage. > > Yes, I think we do not want to export internal functionality which might > be still interesting for the testing coverage. Maybe we want something > like EXPORT_SYMBOL_KSELFTEST which would allow to link within the > kselftest machinery but it wouldn't allow the same for general modules > and will not give any API promisses. > I like this proposal. I think we will open up lot of test opportunities with this approach. Maybe we can use this stress test as a pilot and see where it takes us. thanks, -- Shuah
