Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] improve vmalloc allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 23-10-18 08:26:40, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 09:02:56AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
[...]
> > The way it can be handled is by adding a test module under lib. test_kmod,
> > test_sysctl, test_user_copy etc.
> 
> The problem is that said module can only invoke functions which are
> exported using EXPORT_SYMBOL.  And there's a cost to exporting them,
> which I don't think we're willing to pay, purely to get test coverage.

Yes, I think we do not want to export internal functionality which might
be still interesting for the testing coverage. Maybe we want something
like EXPORT_SYMBOL_KSELFTEST which would allow to link within the
kselftest machinery but it wouldn't allow the same for general modules
and will not give any API promisses.

I wouldn't be surprised if we found some cases of EXPORT_SYMBOL* just to
make a symbol available for testing which would be unfortunate.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux