On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:43:50PM +0100, Johannes Weiner wrote:
[..]
> So structures roughly like this:
>
> struct mem_cgroup {
> ...
> /* key is struct backing_dev_info * */
> struct rb_root memcg_bdis;
> };
>
> struct memcg_bdi {
> /* key is struct address_space * */
> struct rb_root memcg_mappings;
> struct rb_node node;
> };
>
> struct memcg_mapping {
> struct address_space *mapping;
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> struct rb_node node;
> atomic_t count;
> };
>
> struct page_cgroup {
> ...
> struct memcg_mapping *memcg_mapping;
> };
Johannes, didn't you want page->mapping to point to memcg_mapping instead
of increasing the size of page_cgroup?
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>