Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] IO-less balance_dirty_pages() v2 (simple approach)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 08:46:23AM -0700, Curt Wohlgemuth wrote:
> But if one of one's goals is to provide some sort of disk isolation based on
> cgroup parameters, than having at most one stream of write requests
> effectively neuters the IO scheduler.

If you use any kind of buffered I/O you already fail in that respect.
Writeback from balance_dirty_page really is just the wort case right now
with more I/O supposed to be handled by the background threads.  So if
you want to implement isolation properly you need to track the
originator of the I/O between the copy to the pagecache and actual
writeback.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]