Re: [PATCH 02/17] mm: mmu_gather rework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 21:15 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 19:55, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 15:50 +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >
> >> > +static inline void
> >> > +tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int full_mm_flush)
> >> >  {
> >>
> >> checkpatch will bitch about line length.
> >
> > I did a s/full_mm_flush/fullmm/ which puts the line length at 81. At
> > which point I'll ignore it ;-)
> 
> But what does "fullmm" mean here? Shouldn't that be documented.
> BTW, the function no longer returns a struct, but void, so the documentation
> should be updated for sure.

You're talking about the comment right? I'll update that. I was also
considering writing Documentation/mmugather.txt, but that's a slightly
bigger undertaking.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]