Hi,
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 15:23:14 +0200
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The current code fails to print the "[heap]" marking if the heap is
splitted into multiple mappings.
Fix the check so that the marking is displayed in all possible cases:
1. vma matches exactly the heap
2. the heap vma is merged e.g. with bss
3. the heap vma is splitted e.g. due to locked pages
Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx
Why do you believe this problem is serious enough to justify
backporting the fix into -stable?
My bad analysis. It looks like the bug has been there forever, and
since it only results in some information missing from a procfile,
it does not fulfil the stable "critical issue" criteria.
A.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>