Re: [PATCH] mm: check zone->all_unreclaimable in all_unreclaimable()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > Hmm.. Although it solves the problem, I think it's not a good idea that
> > > depends on false alram and give up the retry.
> > 
> > Any alternative proposals?  We should get the livelock fixed if possible..
> 
> I agree with Minchan and can't think this is a real fix....
> Andrey, I'm now trying your fix and it seems your fix for oom-killer,
> 'skip-zombie-process' works enough good for my environ.
> 
> What is your enviroment ? number of cpus ? architecture ? size of memory ?

me too. 'skip-zombie-process V1' work fine. and I didn't seen this patch
improve oom situation.

And, The test program is purely fork bomb. Our oom-killer is not silver
bullet for fork bomb from very long time ago. That said, oom-killer send 
SIGKILL and start to kill the victim process. But, it doesn't prevent 
to be created new memory hogging tasks. Therefore we have no gurantee 
to win process exiting and creating race.

*IF* we really need to care fork bomb issue, we need to write completely 
new VM feature.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]