On Sat, 5 Mar 2011 13:42:24 -0300 Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The block in sys_swapon which does the final adjustments to the > swap_info_struct and to swap_list is the same as the block which > re-inserts it again at sys_swapoff on failure of try_to_unuse(), except > for the order of the operations within the lock. Since the order should > not matter, arbitrarily change sys_swapoff to match sys_swapon, in > preparation to making both share the same code. > > Signed-off-by: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@xxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@xxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>