On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 15:20 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > maybe we can omit rgn->size == 0 checking here. > with that case, dummy array will go though to some extra checking. > > if (rgn->base <= base && rend >= end) > if (base < rgn->base && end >= rgn->base) { > if (base <= rend && end >= rend) { > > but we can spare more checking regarding > rgn->size == 0 Well, the array can be collasped to dummy by the removal of the last block when doing a top overlap, then on the next loop around, we can potentially hit the if (base <= rend && end >= rend) test, and loop again no ? I'd rather keep the test in .. won't hurt. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>