Re: [PATCH] kmemleak: don't use __GFP_NOFAIL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed 30-05-18 07:42:59, Chunyu Hu wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Michal Hocko" <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
> > To: "Chunyu Hu" <chuhu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, malat@xxxxxxxxxx, dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx,
> > "catalin marinas" <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 6:46:37 PM
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmemleak: don't use __GFP_NOFAIL
> > 
> > On Wed 30-05-18 05:35:37, Chunyu Hu wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I'm trying to reuse the make_it_fail field in task for fault injection. As
> > > adding
> > > an extra memory alloc flag is not thought so good,  I think adding task
> > > flag
> > > is either?
> > 
> > Yeah, task flag will be reduced to KMEMLEAK enabled configurations
> > without an additional maint. overhead. Anyway, you should really think
> > about how to guarantee trackability for atomic allocation requests. You
> > cannot simply assume that GFP_NOWAIT will succeed. I guess you really
> 
> Sure. While I'm using task->make_it_fail, I'm still in the direction of 
> making kmemleak avoid fault inject with task flag instead of page alloc flag.
> 
> > want to have a pre-populated pool of objects for those requests. The
> > obvious question is how to balance such a pool. It ain't easy to track
> > memory by allocating more memory...
> 
> This solution is going to make kmemleak trace really nofail. We can think
> later.
> 
> while I'm thinking about if fault inject can be disabled via flag in task.
> 
> Actually, I'm doing something like below, the disable_fault_inject() is
> just setting a flag in task->make_it_fail. But this will depend on if
> fault injection accept a change like this. CCing Akinobu 

You still seem to be missing my point I am afraid (or I am ;). So say
that you want to track a GFP_NOWAIT allocation request. So create_object
will get called with that gfp mask and no matter what you try here your
tracking object will be allocated in a weak allocation context as well
and disable kmemleak. So it only takes a more heavy memory pressure and
the tracing is gone...
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux