On 24.05.2018 11:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:54 AM, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 24.05.2018 10:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:33 AM, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 24.05.2018 10:12, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>>> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 8:24 PM, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> Will be needed by paravirtualized memory devices. >>>>> >>>>> That's a little information. >>>>> >>>>> It would be good to see the entire series at least. >>>> >>>> It's part of this series (guess you only received the cover letter and >>>> this patch). Here a link to the patch using it: >>>> >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/23/803 >>> >>> OK, thanks! >>> >>> It looks like you have a reason to use it in there, but please note >>> that CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA depends on CONFIG_NUMA, so you don't need to use >>> the latter directly in the #ifdef. Also wouldn't IS_ENABLED() work >>> there? >> >> Thanks for the tip on CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA. Wouldn't IS_ENABLED() require to >> have a dummy implementation of pxm_to_node() in case drivers/acpi/numa.c >> is not compiled? > > Yes, it would. > > But since you want export it, you can very well add one, can't you? > I'd even say that it would be prudent to do so. > Sure, can do that :) -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
