On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:54 AM, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 24.05.2018 10:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:33 AM, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 24.05.2018 10:12, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 8:24 PM, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Will be needed by paravirtualized memory devices. >>>> >>>> That's a little information. >>>> >>>> It would be good to see the entire series at least. >>> >>> It's part of this series (guess you only received the cover letter and >>> this patch). Here a link to the patch using it: >>> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/23/803 >> >> OK, thanks! >> >> It looks like you have a reason to use it in there, but please note >> that CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA depends on CONFIG_NUMA, so you don't need to use >> the latter directly in the #ifdef. Also wouldn't IS_ENABLED() work >> there? > > Thanks for the tip on CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA. Wouldn't IS_ENABLED() require to > have a dummy implementation of pxm_to_node() in case drivers/acpi/numa.c > is not compiled? Yes, it would. But since you want export it, you can very well add one, can't you? I'd even say that it would be prudent to do so.
