Hi, Daisuke On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:49:25 +0900 > Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> This patch cleans up unncessary BUG_ON check and confusing >> charge variable. >> >> That's because memcg charge/uncharge could be handled by >> mem_cgroup_[prepare/end] migration itself so charge local variable >> in unmap_and_move lost the role since we introduced 01b1ae63c2. >> >> And mem_cgroup_prepare_migratio return 0 if only it is successful. >> Otherwise, it jumps to unlock label to clean up so BUG_ON(charge) >> isn;t meaningless. >> >> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx> > > It looks good to me, but I have one minor comment. > >> --- >> Âmm/memcontrol.c |  Â1 + >> Âmm/migrate.c  Â|  14 ++++---------- >> Â2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c >> index 2fc97fc..6832926 100644 >> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c >> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c >> @@ -2872,6 +2872,7 @@ static inline int mem_cgroup_move_swap_account(swp_entry_t entry, >> Â/* >>  * Before starting migration, account PAGE_SIZE to mem_cgroup that the old >>  * page belongs to. >> + * Return 0 if charge is successful. Otherwise return -errno. >>  */ >> Âint mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page, >>    struct page *newpage, struct mem_cgroup **ptr, gfp_t gfp_mask) >> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c >> index eb083a6..737c2e5 100644 >> --- a/mm/migrate.c >> +++ b/mm/migrate.c >> @@ -622,7 +622,6 @@ static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, unsigned long private, >>    int *result = NULL; >>    struct page *newpage = get_new_page(page, private, &result); >>    int remap_swapcache = 1; >> -   int charge = 0; >>    struct mem_cgroup *mem; >>    struct anon_vma *anon_vma = NULL; >> >> @@ -637,9 +636,7 @@ static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, unsigned long private, >>        if (unlikely(split_huge_page(page))) >>            goto move_newpage; >> >> -   /* prepare cgroup just returns 0 or -ENOMEM */ >>    rc = -EAGAIN; >> - >>    if (!trylock_page(page)) { >>        if (!force) >>            goto move_newpage; >> @@ -678,13 +675,11 @@ static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, unsigned long private, >>    } >> >>    /* charge against new page */ >> -   charge = mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(page, newpage, &mem, GFP_KERNEL); >> -   if (charge == -ENOMEM) { >> -       rc = -ENOMEM; >> +   rc = mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(page, newpage, &mem, GFP_KERNEL); >> +   if (rc) >>        goto unlock; >> -   } >> -   BUG_ON(charge); >> >> +   rc = -EAGAIN; >>    if (PageWriteback(page)) { >>        if (!force || !sync) >>            goto uncharge; > How about > >    Âif (mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(..)) { >        Ârc = -ENOMEM; >        Âgoto unlock; >    Â} > > ? > > Re-setting "rc" to -EAGAIN is not necessary in this case. > "if (mem_cgroup_...)" is commonly used in many places. > It works now but Johannes doesn't like it and me, either. It makes unnecessary dependency which mem_cgroup_preparre_migration can't propagate error to migrate_pages. Although we don't need it, I want to remove such unnecessary dependency. > Anyway, > >    ÂAcked-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks!. -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href