On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> No functional changes, preparation to simplify the review.
I think this is wrong.
If you introduce the "bool compat" thing, you should also change the
type of the argument pointers to some opaque type at the same time.
It's no longer really a
const char __user *const __user *
pointer at that point. Trying to claim it is, is just wrong. The type
suddently becomes conditional on that 'compat' variable.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>