Re: [PATCH 8/8] trace_uprobe/sdt: Document about reference counter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:12:38 +0530
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 03/15/2018 06:17 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Hi Ravi,
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 20:52:59 +0530
> > Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/14/2018 07:20 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:26:03 +0530
> >>> Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> No functionality changes.
> >>> Please consider to describe what is this change and why, here.
> >> Will add in next version.
> > Thanks, and could you also move this before perf-probe patch?
> > Also Could you make perf-probe check the tracing/README whether
> > the kernel supports reference counter syntax or not?
> >
> > perf-tool can be used on older (or stable) kernel.
> 
> Sure, Will do that.

Please see scan_ftrace_readme@util/probe-file.c :)
It is easy to expand the pattern table.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux