On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 11:03:55AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 03/05/2018 08:26 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > -#define __alloc_zeroed_user_highpage(movableflags, vma, vaddr) \
> > - alloc_page_vma(GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_ZERO | movableflags, vma, vaddr)
> > #define __HAVE_ARCH_ALLOC_ZEROED_USER_HIGHPAGE
> > +#define __alloc_zeroed_user_highpage(movableflags, vma, vaddr) \
> > +({ \
> > + struct page *page; \
> > + gfp_t gfp = movableflags | GFP_HIGHUSER; \
> > + if (vma_is_encrypted(vma)) \
> > + page = __alloc_zeroed_encrypted_user_highpage(gfp, vma, vaddr); \
> > + else \
> > + page = alloc_page_vma(gfp | __GFP_ZERO, vma, vaddr); \
> > + page; \
> > +})
>
> This is pretty darn ugly and also adds a big old branch into the hottest
> path in the page allocator.
>
> It's also really odd that you strip __GFP_ZERO and then go ahead and
> zero the encrypted page unconditionally. It really makes me wonder if
> this is the right spot to be doing this.
>
> Can we not, for instance do it inside alloc_page_vma()?
Yes we can.
It would require substantial change into page allocation path for
CONFIG_NUMA=n as we don't path down vma at the moment. And without vma we
don't have a way to know which KeyID to use.
I will explore how it would fit together.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
