On 03/05/2018 08:26 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> -#define __alloc_zeroed_user_highpage(movableflags, vma, vaddr) \
> - alloc_page_vma(GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_ZERO | movableflags, vma, vaddr)
> #define __HAVE_ARCH_ALLOC_ZEROED_USER_HIGHPAGE
> +#define __alloc_zeroed_user_highpage(movableflags, vma, vaddr) \
> +({ \
> + struct page *page; \
> + gfp_t gfp = movableflags | GFP_HIGHUSER; \
> + if (vma_is_encrypted(vma)) \
> + page = __alloc_zeroed_encrypted_user_highpage(gfp, vma, vaddr); \
> + else \
> + page = alloc_page_vma(gfp | __GFP_ZERO, vma, vaddr); \
> + page; \
> +})
This is pretty darn ugly and also adds a big old branch into the hottest
path in the page allocator.
It's also really odd that you strip __GFP_ZERO and then go ahead and
zero the encrypted page unconditionally. It really makes me wonder if
this is the right spot to be doing this.
Can we not, for instance do it inside alloc_page_vma()?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
