On Wed 21-02-18 10:19:14, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:01:07AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 21-02-18 10:55:26, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Tue 20-02-18 22:24:57, Dan Rue wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > I bisected the failure to this commit. The problem is seen on multiple
> > > > architectures (tested x86-64 and arm64).
> > >
> > > The patch shouldn't have introduced any functional changes IIRC. But let
> > > me have a look
> >
> > Hmm, I guess I can see it. Does the following help?
> > ---
> > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > index 7c204e3d132b..a963f2034dfc 100644
> > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > @@ -1583,7 +1583,7 @@ static struct page *alloc_surplus_huge_page(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > page = NULL;
> > } else {
> > h->surplus_huge_pages++;
> > - h->nr_huge_pages_node[page_to_nid(page)]++;
> > + h->surplus_huge_pages_node[page_to_nid(page)]++;
> > }
> >
> > out_unlock:
>
> That did the trick. Confirmed fixed on v4.15-3389-g0c397daea1d4 and
> v4.16-rc2 with the above patch.
Thanks a lot for re-testing! Can I assume your Tested-by?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
