On Wed 21-02-18 10:55:26, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 20-02-18 22:24:57, Dan Rue wrote:
[...]
> > I bisected the failure to this commit. The problem is seen on multiple
> > architectures (tested x86-64 and arm64).
>
> The patch shouldn't have introduced any functional changes IIRC. But let
> me have a look
Hmm, I guess I can see it. Does the following help?
---
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 7c204e3d132b..a963f2034dfc 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1583,7 +1583,7 @@ static struct page *alloc_surplus_huge_page(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
page = NULL;
} else {
h->surplus_huge_pages++;
- h->nr_huge_pages_node[page_to_nid(page)]++;
+ h->surplus_huge_pages_node[page_to_nid(page)]++;
}
out_unlock:
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
