On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 08:42:58AM +0500, mikhail wrote:
> [101309.501428] (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: [<00000000df1d676f>] xfs_trans_alloc+0xe2/0x120 [xfs]
> [101309.501465]
> but task is already holding lock:
> [101309.501466] (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: [<000000002ed6959d>] fs_reclaim_acquire.part.74+0x5/0x30
> [101309.501470]
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
This one's an already-known mis-annotation.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
