Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/13] lru_lock scalability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,


On 31/01/18 23:04, daniel.m.jordan@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
lru_lock, a per-node* spinlock that protects an LRU list, is one of the
hottest locks in the kernel.  On some workloads on large machines, it
shows up at the top of lock_stat.

One way to improve lru_lock scalability is to introduce an array of locks,
with each lock protecting certain batches of LRU pages.

         *ooooooooooo**ooooooooooo**ooooooooooo**oooo ...
         |           ||           ||           ||
          \ batch 1 /  \ batch 2 /  \ batch 3 /

In this ASCII depiction of an LRU, a page is represented with either '*'
or 'o'.  An asterisk indicates a sentinel page, which is a page at the
edge of a batch.  An 'o' indicates a non-sentinel page.

To remove a non-sentinel LRU page, only one lock from the array is
required.  This allows multiple threads to remove pages from different
batches simultaneously.  A sentinel page requires lru_lock in addition to
a lock from the array.

Full performance numbers appear in the last patch in this series, but this
prototype allows a microbenchmark to do up to 28% more page faults per
second with 16 or more concurrent processes.

This work was developed in collaboration with Steve Sistare.

Note: This is an early prototype.  I'm submitting it now to support my
request to attend LSF/MM, as well as get early feedback on the idea.  Any
comments appreciated.


* lru_lock is actually per-memcg, but without memcg's in the picture it
   becomes per-node.
GFS2 has an lru list for glocks, which can be contended under certain workloads. Work is still ongoing to figure out exactly why, but this looks like it might be a good approach to that issue too. The main purpose of GFS2's lru list is to allow shrinking of the glocks under memory pressure via the gfs2_scan_glock_lru() function, and it looks like this type of approach could be used there to improve the scalability,

Steve.


Aaron Lu (1):
   mm: add a percpu_pagelist_batch sysctl interface

Daniel Jordan (12):
   mm: allow compaction to be disabled
   mm: add lock array to pgdat and batch fields to struct page
   mm: introduce struct lru_list_head in lruvec to hold per-LRU batch
     info
   mm: add batching logic to add/delete/move API's
   mm: add lru_[un]lock_all APIs
   mm: convert to-be-refactored lru_lock callsites to lock-all API
   mm: temporarily convert lru_lock callsites to lock-all API
   mm: introduce add-only version of pagevec_lru_move_fn
   mm: add LRU batch lock API's
   mm: use lru_batch locking in release_pages
   mm: split up release_pages into non-sentinel and sentinel passes
   mm: splice local lists onto the front of the LRU

  include/linux/mm_inline.h | 209 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  include/linux/mm_types.h  |   5 ++
  include/linux/mmzone.h    |  25 +++++-
  kernel/sysctl.c           |   9 ++
  mm/Kconfig                |   1 -
  mm/huge_memory.c          |   6 +-
  mm/memcontrol.c           |   5 +-
  mm/mlock.c                |  11 +--
  mm/mmzone.c               |   7 +-
  mm/page_alloc.c           |  43 +++++++++-
  mm/page_idle.c            |   4 +-
  mm/swap.c                 | 208 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
  mm/vmscan.c               |  49 +++++------
  13 files changed, 500 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux