On Thu 01-02-18 10:41:26, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 09:24:38PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > This would both document the context > > and also limit NOFS allocations to bare minumum. > > Yup, most of XFS already uses implicit GFP_NOFS allocation calls via > the transaction context process flag manipulation. Yeah, xfs is in quite a good shape. There are still around 40+ KM_NOFS users. Are there any major obstacles to remove those? Or is this just "send patches" thing. Compare that to $ git grep GFP_NOFS -- fs/btrfs/ | wc -l 272 -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
