* Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx> [2011-02-06 07:45:05]: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > on the MM summit, I would like to talk about the current state of > > memory control groups, the features and extensions that are currently > > being developed for it, and what their status is. > > > > I am especially interested in talking about the current runtime memory > > overhead memcg comes with (1% of ram) and what we can do to shrink it. > > [...] > > Would other people be interested in discussing this? > > Well, YES :) > > In addition to what you mentioned, I believe it would be possible to > avoid the duplication of global vs per-cgroup LRU lists. global > scanning would translate into proportional scanning of all per-cgroup > lists. If we could get that done, it would IMO become reasonable to > integrate back the remaining few page_cgroup fields into struct page > itself... > We thought about the duplication and proportial scanning quite a bit prior to final design and integration, but it does not scale well as cgroups increase in number. I would also like to discuss things like accounting shared pages, etc. -- Three Cheers, Balbir -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>