On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > on the MM summit, I would like to talk about the current state of > memory control groups, the features and extensions that are currently > being developed for it, and what their status is. > > I am especially interested in talking about the current runtime memory > overhead memcg comes with (1% of ram) and what we can do to shrink it. > [...] > Would other people be interested in discussing this? Well, YES :) In addition to what you mentioned, I believe it would be possible to avoid the duplication of global vs per-cgroup LRU lists. global scanning would translate into proportional scanning of all per-cgroup lists. If we could get that done, it would IMO become reasonable to integrate back the remaining few page_cgroup fields into struct page itself... -- Michel "Walken" Lespinasse A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>