Re: [PATCH 1/2] Allow GUP to fail instead of waiting on a page.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:31:57 +0200
Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > This?
> > 
> Yes, this is better. Thanks you. I see that the patch below is in your queue
> already. Should I re-spin my patch with improved comment anyway?

Nope, that's OK - I fold fixup patches into the base patch before
sending them onwards.

There's always a risk that someone will get a hold of an earlier
version of the patch, but a) sending out a v2 doesn't eliminate that
risk and b) it's not very important anyway (in this case) and c)
because I separate the base patch from the fixup patches, I'll easily
notice if someone merges an earlier patch, because I'm left holding
stray fixup patches.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]