On 01/27/2011 01:52 PM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
if (!zone_watermark_ok_safe(zone, order, - 8*high_wmark_pages(zone), end_zone, 0)) + (zone->present_pages + + KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO-1) / + KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO + + high_wmark_pages(zone), end_zone, 0)) shrink_zone(priority, zone,&sc);
Isn't (zone->present_pages + 99) / 100 + high_wmark_pages(zone) pretty much guaranteed to be significantly larger than the 8 times the high watermark we had before? -- All rights reversed -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>