Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: NUMA stats code cleanup and enhancement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 30-11-17 17:32:08, kemi wrote:
[...]
> Your patch saves more code than mine because the node stats framework is reused
> for numa stats. But it has a performance regression because of the limitation of
> threshold size (125 at most, see calculate_normal_threshold() in vmstat.c) 
> in inc_node_state().

But this "regression" would be visible only on those workloads which
really need to squeeze every single cycle out of the allocation hot path
and those are supposed to disable the accounting altogether. Or is this
visible on a wider variety of workloads.

Do not get me wrong. If we want to make per-node stats more optimal,
then by all means let's do that. But having 3 sets of counters is just
way to much.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux