Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm,vmscan: Make unregister_shrinker() no-op if register_shrinker() failed.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 24-11-17 22:21:55, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > Since we can encourage register_shrinker() callers to check for failure
> > > by marking register_shrinker() as __must_check, unregister_shrinker()
> > > can stay silent.
> > 
> > I am not sure __must_check is the right way. We already do get
> > allocation warning if the registration fails so silent unregister is
> > acceptable. Unchecked register_shrinker is a bug like any other
> > unchecked error path.
> 
> I consider that __must_check is the simplest way to find all of
> unchecked register_shrinker bugs. Why not to encourage users to fix?

because git grep doesn't require to patch the kernel and still provide
the information you want. I would understand __must_check if we had
hundreds users of this api and they come and go quickly.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux