Re: [PATCH 00/25] mm: Preemptibility -v7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> This patch-set makes part of the mm a lot more preemptible. It converts
> i_mmap_lock and anon_vma->lock to mutexes and makes mmu_gather fully
> preemptible.
>
> The main motivation was making mm_take_all_locks() preemptible, since it
> appears people are nesting hundreds of spinlocks there.

Just curious: why is mm_take_all_locks() a problem? As far as I can see
it's just used when starting KVM or GRU the first time. Is that a common
situation?

-Andi

-- 
Andi Kleen
Intel Open Source Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]