Re: [PATCH 00/25] mm: Preemptibility -v7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Its nesting hundreds of spinlocks (255+) make the preempt debug code
unhappy, it also causes fun latencies when you do start KVM/GRU
Although arguably that's the least convincing reason to do all this its
the one that got me to actually compose this series -- I really should
write a new leader..
Least Convincing is a good description...
Tuning operations which only happen once is not very interesting, especially if that affects
fast paths.

Making all this preemptible also allows making the whole mmu_gather
thing preemptible, which is something we've wanted to do for a long
while, it also allows XPMEM or whatever that thing was called (Andrea
knows) and of course, it moves a part of -rt upstream.

I thought the reason for the preempt off inside the mmu gather region was
to stay on the same CPU for local/remote flushes. How would it change that?

If we decide to keep patch 24, it also simplifies the truncate path
quite a bit.
That sounds like a good thing. Making truncate simpler is always good.

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]