On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 12:56 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited doesn't really need mapping as well. All > it needs is the inode and we already have it in callers. So would it > make sense to refactor a bit further and make its argument an inode? My only concern is that, balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() is an exported function so changing its signature could potentially break some drivers? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
