On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> -static int ecryptfs_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> +static int ecryptfs_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> + unsigned long map_flags)
>> {
>> struct file *lower_file = ecryptfs_file_to_lower(file);
>> /*
>> @@ -179,7 +180,7 @@ static int ecryptfs_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> */
>> if (!lower_file->f_op->mmap)
>> return -ENODEV;
>> - return generic_file_mmap(file, vma);
>> + return generic_file_mmap(file, vma, 0);
>
> Shouldn't ecryptfs pass on the flags? Same for coda_file_mmap and
> shm_mmap.
Yes, I'll get those fixed up.
>
>> -static inline int call_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> +static inline int call_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> + unsigned long flags)
>> {
>> - return file->f_op->mmap(file, vma);
>> + return file->f_op->mmap(file, vma, flags);
>> }
>
> It would be great to kill this pointless wrapper while we're at it.
Will do.
Thanks for taking a look!
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
