Hi Michal,
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 02:41:19PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 15-08-17 01:19:16, Chen Yu wrote:
> [...]
> > @@ -2561,8 +2562,10 @@ void mark_free_pages(struct zone *zone)
> > unsigned long i;
> >
> > pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> > - for (i = 0; i < (1UL << order); i++)
> > + for (i = 0; i < (1UL << order); i++) {
> > swsusp_set_page_free(pfn_to_page(pfn + i));
> > + touch_nmi_watchdog();
> > + }
>
> this is rather excessive. Why don't you simply call touch_nmi_watchdog
> once per every 1000 pages? Or once per free_list entry?
>
Yes, this would be less costy, previously I thought that, since touch_nmi_watchdog()
would only update very limited amount of percpu variables and it is not costy when
comparing with the huge loop in radix tree searching by the swsusp_set_page_free(),
thus I put it in the deepest level in this loop, as this might be a safer place to avoid NMI.
> Moreover why don't you need to touch_nmi_watchdog in the loop over all
> pfns in the zone (right above this loop)?
As the NMI was triggered when checking the free_list rather than in the loop over
all pfns, it seems that the former has more possibility to catch a NMI if the
latter has already taken too much time. But yes, a safer way is to feed dog
in the latter too. I'll modify the code according to your suggestion.
Thanks,
Yu
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
