On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:24:38AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: >On Wed 14-06-17 17:12:06, Wei Yang wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 08:32:06AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: >> >On Wed 14-06-17 14:12:59, Wei Yang wrote: >> >[...] >> >> Hi, Michal >> >> >> >> Not sure you missed this one or you think this is fine. >> >> >> >> Hmm... this will not happen since we must offline a whole memory_block? >> > >> >yes >> > >> >> So the memory_hotplug/unplug unit is memory_block instead of mem_section? >> > >> >yes. >> >> If this is true, the check_hotplug_memory_range() should be fixed too. > >as I've said earlier. There are many code paths which are quite >confusing and they expect sub-section granularity while they in fact >won't work with sub memblock granularity. This is a larger project >I am afraid and it would be great if you are willing to try to >consolidate that code. I have that on my todo list but there are more >pressing things to address first for me now. > Yep, I am willing to have a try. :-) >-- >Michal Hocko >SUSE Labs -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
