On 05/29/2017 04:25 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Anshuman Khandual <khandual@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> So the question is are we willing to do all these changes across >> the tree to achieve common definitions of KB, MB, GB, TB in the >> kernel ? Is it worth ? > > No I don't think it's worth the churn. > > But have you looked at using the "proper" names, ie. KiB, MiB, GiB? > > AFAICS the only clash is: > > drivers/mtd/ssfdc.c:#define KiB(x) ( (x) * 1024L ) > drivers/mtd/ssfdc.c:#define MiB(x) ( KiB(x) * 1024L ) > > Which would be easy to convert. Sure, will take a look into generalizing KiB/MiB/GiB instead of current proposal for KB/MB/GB. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
