On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 09:35:37PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: > In fact, during the test, I found the overhead of sort() is comparable > with the performance difference of adding likely()/unlikely() to the > "if" in the function. Huang, This discussion is started from your optimization code: if (nr_swapfiles > 1) sort(); I don't have such fast machine so cannot test it. However, you added such optimization code in there so I guess it's *worth* to review so with spending my time, I pointed out what you are missing and suggested a idea to find a compromise. Now you are saying sort is so fast so no worth to add more logics to avoid the overhead? Then, please just drop that if condition part and instead, sort it unconditionally. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>