Hi Laura,
Thanks for the patch.
On 3 March 2017 at 03:14, Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Frameworks that may want to enumerate CMA heaps (e.g. Ion) will find it
> useful to have an explicit name attached to each region. Store the name
> in each CMA structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c | 5 +++--
> include/linux/cma.h | 4 +++-
> mm/cma.c | 11 +++++++++--
> mm/cma.h | 1 +
> mm/cma_debug.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
<snip>
> +const char *cma_get_name(const struct cma *cma)
> +{
> + return cma->name ? cma->name : "(undefined)";
> +}
> +
Would it make sense to perhaps have the idx stored as the name,
instead of 'undefined'? That would make sure that the various cma
names are still unique.
> static unsigned long cma_bitmap_aligned_mask(const struct cma *cma,
> int align_order)
> {
> @@ -168,6 +173,7 @@ core_initcall(cma_init_reserved_areas);
> */
> int __init cma_init_reserved_mem(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
> unsigned int order_per_bit,
> + const char *name,
> struct cma **res_cma)
> {
Best regards,
Sumit.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
