Re: [RFC PATCH v3] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/06/2017 10:02 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 08:55:03 -0800

Actually, that reminds me...  How does your code interface with ksm?  Or
is there no interaction needed since you're always working on virtual
addresses?

This reminds me, I consider this feature potentially extremely useful for
kernel debugging.  So I would like to make sure we don't implement anything
in a way which would preclude that in the long term.

I agree and please do point out if I have made any implementation decisions that could preclude that.

Thanks,
Khalid

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]