Re: [RFC PATCH v3] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/06/2017 08:36 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
On 01/06/2017 07:32 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote:
I agree with you on simplicity first. Subpage granularity is complex,
but the architecture allows for subpage granularity. Maybe the right
approach is to support this at page granularity first for swappable
pages and then expand to subpage granularity in a subsequent patch?
Pages locked in memory can already use subpage granularity with my patch.

What do you mean by "locked in memory"?  mlock()'d memory can still be
migrated around and still requires "swap" ptes, for instance.

You are right. Page migration can invalidate subpage granularity even for locked pages. Is it possible to use cpusets to keep a task and its memory locked on a single node? Just wondering if there are limited cases where subpage granularity could work without supporting subpage granularity for tags in swap. It still sounds like the right thing to do is to get a reliable implementation in place with page size granularity and then add the complexity of subpage granularity.

Thanks,
Khalid

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]