Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dax: masking off __GFP_FS in fs DAX handlers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:55:23PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> The callers into dax needs to clear __GFP_FS since they are responsible
> for acquiring locks / transactions that block __GFP_FS allocation. They
> will restore the lag when dax function return.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>

This seems correct to me.

Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]