Re: Softlockup during memory allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 24-11-16 15:09:38, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
[...]
> I just checked all the zones for both nodes (the machines have 2 NUMA
> nodes) so essentially there are no reclaimable pages - all are
> anonymous. So the pertinent question is why process are sleeping in
> reclamation path when there are no pages to free. I also observed the
> same behavior on a different node, this time the priority was 0 and the
> code hasn't resorted to OOM. This seems all too strange..

>From my experience we usually hit the memcg OOM quickly if there are no
reclaimable pages. I do not remember anything big changed recently in
that area. Could you enable mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate,
mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim__{begin,end} and mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive
tracepoints to see what is going on during the reclaim?

I suspect we will see some minor reclaim activity there which will
basically "livelock" the oom from happening but let's see.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]