On Friday, November 25, 2016 8:38:25 AM CET Vitaly Wool wrote:
> >> diff --git a/mm/z3fold.c b/mm/z3fold.c
> >> index e282ba073e77..66ac7a7dc934 100644
> >> --- a/mm/z3fold.c
> >> +++ b/mm/z3fold.c
> >> @@ -884,7 +884,7 @@ static int __init init_z3fold(void)
> >> {
> >> /* Fail the initialization if z3fold header won't fit in one chunk */
> >> if (sizeof(struct z3fold_header) > ZHDR_SIZE_ALIGNED) {
> >> - pr_err("z3fold: z3fold_header size (%d) is bigger than "
> >> + pr_err("z3fold: z3fold_header size (%zd) is bigger than "
> >> "the chunk size (%d), can't proceed\n",
> >> sizeof(struct z3fold_header) , ZHDR_SIZE_ALIGNED);
> >> return -E2BIG;
> >
> > The embedded "z3fold: " prefix here should be removed
> > as there's a pr_fmt that also adds it.
> >
> > The test looks like it should be a BUILD_BUG_ON rather
> > than any runtime test too.
>
> It used to be BUILD_BUG_ON but we deliberately changed that because
> sizeof(spinlock_t) gets bloated in debug builds, so it just won't
> build with default CHUNK_SIZE.
Could this be improved by making the CHUNK_SIZE bigger depending on
the debug options?
Alternatively, how about using a bit_spin_lock instead of raw_spin_lock?
That would guarantee a fixed size for the lock and make z3fold_header
always 24 bytes (on 32-bit architectures) or 40 bytes
(on 64-bit architectures). You could even play some tricks with the
first_num field to make it fit in the same word as the lock and make the
structure fit into 32 bytes if you care about that.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>